Articles Posted in Green Cards

by

Is your case stuck at the National Visa Center with no interview in sight? You are not alone. Thousands of applicants are waiting months—or even years—for their visa interviews to be scheduled. The good news is that you may have options. In this video, we discuss three proven strategies that could help push your NVC case forward.

Why are so many cases stuck at the National Visa Center for months—or even years?

The problem is a perfect storm of overwhelming case volume, limited availability of interview appointments, staffing shortages, and delays at U.S. consulates worldwide.

Even after a case is documentarily complete and ready to move forward, it can remain at the NVC for months—or longer—until the appropriate embassy has an available interview slot.

Sweeping visa restrictions have made the backlogs even worse. The Trump administration has fully or partially restricted entry and visa issuance for nationals of 39 countries, while immigrant visa issuance has been separately paused for nationals of 75 countries.

Although U.S. embassies may remain open and continue scheduling some interviews, affected visas generally cannot be issued while these restrictions remain in place.

The result is thousands of applicants left in limbo, with no clear timeline and little information about when their cases will finally move forward.

Continue reading

by

Imagine you are a green card holder planning summer travel with your family. You take your vacation, enjoy your trip, and return to the United States expecting to come home. But at the port of entry, CBP sends you to secondary inspection.

You have no criminal convictions. You only have pending charges — allegations that have not yet been proven. Still, CBP officers do not immediately allow you back into the country. Suddenly, your ability to reenter the United States is uncertain.

This is not science fiction. This is the reality created by a new Supreme Court decision that could make international travel riskier and more complicated for green card holders returning to the United States.

New Court Decision

That scenario is exactly why the Supreme Court’s decision in Blanche v. Lau matters. In that case, the Court held that a green card holder returning from international travel may face serious problems at the airport based on certain pending or alleged criminal conduct, even before there is a conviction.

The ruling does not mean that every pending charge will automatically result in denial of entry. However, it gives CBP and DHS more authority to treat certain returning green card holders as applicants seeking admission for the first time, rather than lawful permanent residents simply coming back home.

Before Lau

Before Blanche v. Lau, a lawful permanent resident generally had the right to return to the United States after temporary travel abroad, especially for trips under one year. In most cases, a green card holder only needed to answer questions confirming their identity and permanent resident status.

However, that right was not absolute. Immigration law has long allowed CBP to treat a green card holder as an “applicant for admission” in certain situations.

Continue reading

by

The new USCIS memo is finally showing its true colors.

Imagine coming to the U.S. legally, spending years doing everything right, and finally applying for your green card—only to be denied at the interview. Not because you are ineligible, but because a USCIS officer used the new USCIS memo to deny your case as a matter of discretion.

That’s exactly what happened in Michael’s case.

Real-Life Example: Green Card Denied Under the New USCIS Memo

Michael came to the United States legally 15 years ago on an F-1 student visa. Like many international students, he had plans to study, build a future, and follow the rules.

But life got difficult. Due to financial hardship and mental health struggles, Michael was unable to finish school. As a result, he fell out of F-1 status. To survive, he worked for a short period without authorization.

Years later, Michael married a U.S. citizen and applied for his green card through marriage.

At his green card interview, USCIS did not question whether their marriage was real. The problem was something else.

The officer told Michael that his green card would be denied under the new USCIS memo—not because he lacked eligibility through marriage, but because of the officer’s discretionary review of his past immigration violations. Continue reading

by

 If you’re in the United States on a temporary visa and hope to become a permanent resident, recent changes in how USCIS reviews green card applications could impact your case.

On May 22, 2026, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that temporary visa holders seeking green cards should leave the United States and complete their immigration process through consular processing in their home countries, instead of applying for adjustment of status.

Does this mean adjustment of status is no longer an option? No. Although the government has emphasized that individuals seeking to immigrate to the United States should generally obtain immigrant visas through consular processing abroad, adjustment of status remains available as a discretionary pathway to lawful permanent residence.

What is Adjustment of Status?

For years, adjustment of status has been one of the most commonly used and reliable pathways for immigrants already living in the United States to apply for a green card. The process typically involves filing Form I-485, remaining in the United States while the application is pending, attending an interview, and ultimately receiving a final decision.

With limited exceptions, adjustment of status is generally not available for those who entered the country illegally.

USCIS’ announcement has not eliminated the ability to apply for adjustment of status, but the agency has created new obstacles for green card holders to obtain approval.

Continue reading

by

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services recently announced that it will lift holds on the adjudication of green cards and other immigration-benefit requests for a select group of individuals.

As part of these exemptions, USCIS has lifted holds on some family petitions filed by U.S. citizens, intercountry adoptions, rescheduled naturalization oath ceremonies, asylum applications from lower-risk countries, work authorization requests, special immigrant visas, refugee registrations for South African nationals, applications associated with medical physicians, and cases that completed enhanced security vetting through Operation PARRIS.

This means that nationals who were previously subject to the “75-country pause” are no longer affected by the suspension and may resume normal processing of their immigration applications if they fall within one of the above categories.

Unfortunately, if you do not fall within one of the exempted categories, the adjudication of your green card and immigrant visa application will remain on hold.

Continue reading

by

Starting April 27, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) implemented a new enhanced FBI security screening process that is affecting the adjudication of immigration benefit requests that require finger-print based background checks. The update requires USCIS officers to conduct additional background vetting before approving eligible cases.

Under the new policy, officers must resubmit certain pending applications for expanded FBI fingerprint and criminal history checks and place cases on hold until the updated review is completed. The change is expected to impact a range of immigration filings, including adjustment of status (green card) applications, asylum cases, naturalization applications, employment authorization documents, and some family-based petitions.

Who is Impacted

The temporary delays primarily affect applicants whose fingerprints were submitted before April 27, as USCIS is now reprocessing those records through the updated vetting system. Newly filed applications may also experience longer processing times while the agency works through the increased review requirements.

Continue reading

by

USCIS may not be denying your green card case — but it may be quietly putting it on hold.

As of December 2, 2025, USCIS and the State Department began a new “hold and review” process for certain immigration applications filed by individuals from 39 countries – suspending the issuance of visas and green cards for all applicants for an uncertain period of time. Under this policy, officers are expected to pause final decisions while enhanced security vetting processes are established by the government.

For applicants, that means one thing: more delays and uncertainty.

If your case was moving forward, your fingerprints were already taken, or you were expecting an interview soon, this sudden pause could explain why everything has gone silent.

In this update, we break down what USCIS’s “hold and review” policy means, who may be affected, whether you need to take action, and what applicants should watch for next.

Why is there a “hold and review” policy?

In June and December 2025, the President issued various executive orders, imposing immigration restrictions affecting individuals from 39 countries. The ban affects their ability to enter the United States, receive U.S. visas, and obtain immigration benefits through agencies like USCIS and the Department of State via Consular processing.

The affected countries include Afghanistan, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Dominica, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gabon, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, The Gambia, Togo, Tonga, Turkmenistan, Venezuela, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and individuals holding Palestinian-Authority-issued travel documents.

Continue reading

by

If you’ve made it to the green card interview stage, you’re closer than ever to becoming a lawful permanent resident—but it’s also the part that makes many applicants the most nervous. What actually happens in that room? What kinds of questions will they ask?

The green card interview is a chance for immigration officers to verify your application, confirm your eligibility, and ensure everything checks out. Still, the uncertainty can feel overwhelming if you don’t know what to expect.

In this guide, we’ll walk you through exactly what happens during a green card interview, from the moment you arrive to the types of questions you’ll be asked. Whether your application is based on marriage, family, or employment, understanding the process can help you feel more confident, prepared, and in control on the big day.

Importance of the Green Card Interview

The green card interview is one of the most critical steps in the immigration process because it’s where your entire application is reviewed face-to-face by an immigration officer. Up until this point, decisions are largely based on paperwork, but the interview allows the officer to verify your identity, confirm the accuracy of your information, and assess your eligibility in real time.

It’s also an opportunity for them to detect inconsistencies, clarify details, and, in certain cases—such as marriage-based applications—determine whether your relationship is genuine. A successful interview can lead directly to approval, while red flags or incomplete answers may delay your case or even result in denial, making preparation and honesty essential.

Nearly All Green Card Cases Require an Interview in 2026

As of 2026, the vast majority of green card applications now require a mandatory in-person interview as part of the application process. While some categories were previously eligible for interview waivers, changing immigration policies have made in-person review the standard rather than the exception.

This shift allows immigration officers to more thoroughly verify applicant information, assess eligibility, and detect potential inconsistencies or fraud. As a result, applicants across family-based, employment-based, and other categories should plan for an interview and prepare accordingly, treating it as a central step in securing permanent residency.

Continue reading

by

Imagine building a life in the United States, paying taxes, buying a home, putting down roots, only to have it all put at risk by a single misstep. One arrest. One extended trip abroad. Suddenly, your green card status is on the line. Sound impossible? For thousands of green card holders during the Trump administration, this has become a very real and unsettling reality. By contrast, those who become U.S. citizens can live in the United States with greater security and peace of mind.

In this blog post, we discuss five key differences between green card holders and U.S. citizens that might make you rethink staying a permanent resident.

#1 Deportation Risk

One of the most important differences between green card holders and U.S. citizens is the risk of deportation. Green card holders have the right to live and work in the United States, but their status is not guaranteed forever.

Certain situations can put a green card at risk, including criminal convictions, immigration violations, or even spending too much time outside the U.S. In these cases, a green card holder may be placed in removal proceedings.

By contrast, U.S. citizens cannot be deported even when convicted of a criminal offense. This key difference means that only U.S. citizenship offers permanent protection from deportation.

Continue reading

by

If you’re eligible for U.S. citizenship but still holding onto your green card, waiting could cost you more than you think. Backlogs are growing, processing times are stretching, and delays are only expected to get worse. What seems like “waiting for the right time” can quickly turn into years of lost opportunity. In this video, we break down why applying now is the smartest move you can make and what’s at stake.

What’s Causing the Long Wait for U.S. Citizenship?

Becoming a U.S. citizen is taking longer than ever due to limited government resources and heightened scrutiny of an applicant’s good moral character, including extensive background checks.

Biometrics appointments have become a significant bottleneck in the U.S. citizenship application process, often adding weeks or even months of delay to an application. These appointments—handled by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services—are required to collect fingerprints, photos, and signatures for background checks, but limited appointment availability and heightened scrutiny have caused delays.

Since biometrics is a required step before an application can move forward, these delays can stall the entire process, contributing to the growing backlog and extending the timeline for naturalization.

Continue reading