Articles Posted in Immigrants

by

For most green card holders, returning to the United States after a vacation feels like a routine part of travel. But in 2026, that return can sometimes come with unexpected problems.

In recent months, some green card holders have been taken to secondary inspections, questioned, and even detained at U.S. airports.

In these cases, the issue is not the vacation itself, but something in the traveler’s immigration history, criminal record, or time spent outside the country that gets flagged by Customs and Border Protection.

In this article, we’ll break down the top 3 reasons green card holders can run into trouble when returning to the U.S., along with 5 airports where travelers should be especially prepared for closer inspection.

The “Arriving Alien” Trap for Green Card Holders

One of the biggest risks for a green card holder returning from abroad is being treated as an “arriving alien” by immigration officers.

Normally, a lawful permanent resident returning from a trip is not considered to be seeking admission to the United States. But under certain circumstances, CBP can do just that.

Once CBP treats a green card holder as an arriving alien, they can be required to prove they are still eligible to enter the United States under rules for people seeking admission.

This matters because it can expose travelers to detention and removal proceedings and can make defending the case more complicated.

Continue reading

by

USCIS recently introduced an important change affecting green card applicants who rely on a sponsor to meet the financial requirements for the I-864 Affidavit of Support.

Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, is a legally binding form used to show that a green card applicant has sufficient financial support and is unlikely to become a public charge. The sponsor of the I-864 is generally the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident who filed the immigrant petition. If the petitioner does not meet the income requirement for their household size, a joint sponsor may be needed.

Under new USCIS policies, sponsors and joint sponsors are now required to provide additional financial information, including their credit score and credit report.

USCIS has also released a new edition of Form I-864 reflecting these changes, which will be required beginning October 1.

Why does this matter?

A sponsor or joint sponsor with poor credit, high debt, late payments, collections, or bankruptcy could face greater scrutiny because USCIS may question whether they are financially capable of supporting the intending immigrant. This could result in requests for additional evidence, processing delays, or a determination that the sponsor or joint sponsor does not qualify.

If a sponsor has a credit or security freeze in place, USCIS may be unable to access the information needed to evaluate Form I-864.

Continue reading

by

We are pleased to report that the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has published the September 2026 Visa Bulletin.

In this blog post, we breakdown the movement of the employment-based and family-sponsored categories in the coming month.

Adjustment of Status Chart

For adjustment of status filings to permanent residence in the month of September, USCIS will continue using the Dates for Filing Chart for family-sponsored categories only.

For employment-based categories, USCIS will also continue using the Final Action Dates Chart.

Highlights of the September 2026 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of September?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

  • No changes except for EB-4 which will advance 2 months to December 15, 2022
  • EB-2 India and EB-5 India remain unavailable
  • The State Department warns that the EB-2, EB-1 India, and EB-5 unreserved categories may become unavailable before the end of September, with availability resuming when the new fiscal year starts in October.

Dates for Filing Advancements

  • No changes from August Visa Bulletin

Continue reading

by

The days of mailing immigration applications to USCIS may soon be coming to an end.

A new rule effective August 11th gives USCIS the power to require certain immigration forms to be filed electronically instead of on paper.

This is changing how immigration cases are filed and how applicants move through the process. As USCIS shifts more forms online, we can expect confusion, filing mistakes, and cases being rejected for failing to follow the new electronic filing requirements.

In this blog, we will explain why USCIS is making this change, when the new rule will begin affecting applicants, and what you can do now to prepare for mandatory online filing.

What Is the New Rule About?

USCIS will be able to require certain immigration forms, supporting documents, and filing fees to be submitted electronically instead of by mail. This is similar to the way in with the U.S. Department of State has required online filing of visa applications where applicants are required to submit electronic forms to DOS through its online system, Consular Electronic Application Center.

Once USCIS makes online filing mandatory for a particular form, applicants will generally have to complete the entire filing through a USCIS online account unless they qualify for a limited exception or waiver.

USCIS must provide at least 60 days’ notice before requiring a specific form to be filed electronically.

Continue reading

by

October 1 can change everything for green card applicants stuck in the immigrant visa backlog. With the start of the new fiscal year, a fresh supply of immigrant visa numbers becomes available—and applicants who are ready can move fast when their priority dates become current. If your case is close, the time to prepare is before October 1, not after.

If you are from India, China, the Philippines, or Mexico, you may already be familiar with the effects of high demand and limited immigrant visa availability. For example, the EB-2 category for India has been unavailable for final action since July 2026 because of heavy demand. On the family-sponsored side, countries such as India and Mexico have also faced significant backlogs as visa demand has outpaced the number of available visas.

While demand from these countries is expected to remain high, the October 1 fiscal-year reset brings a new annual supply of immigrant visa numbers, which can allow more applicants to move forward with interviews and final visa issuance.

In this video, we break down what you need to know—and what you should do now—to put yourself in the strongest position before October 1.

What Is the End-of-Year Fiscal Reset?

The U.S. government’s fiscal year runs from October 1 through September 30, and many employment- and family-based immigrant visa categories are subject to annual numerical limits set by Congress.

Except for immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, applicants generally must wait until an immigrant visa number becomes available based on their priority date and country of nationality before they can be scheduled for an interview and ultimately receive an immigrant visa.

When the new fiscal year begins on October 1, those annual visa limits reset, allowing the government to begin using a new supply of immigrant visa numbers.

For applicants stuck in backlogged categories like EB-2 India and F2A Mexico, this reset is especially important because the allocation of new visa numbers creates new opportunities for eligible applicants to move forward in the green card process.

Continue reading

by

We are pleased to report that the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has published the August 2026 Visa Bulletin.

In this blog post, we breakdown the movement of the employment-based and family-sponsored categories in the coming month.

Adjustment of Status Chart

For adjustment of status filings to permanent residence in the month of August, USCIS will continue using the Dates for Filing Chart for family-sponsored categories only.

For employment-based categories, USCIS will also continue using the Final Action Dates Chart.

Highlights of the August 2026 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of August?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

EB-1 Aliens of extraordinary ability, Outstanding Professors and Researchers, and Certain Multinational Managers or Executives

  • EB-1 China will advance 1 month to July 1, 2023
  • Except for India, all other countries will remain current

EB-1 India Visa Bulletin Note: High demand and number use by those chargeable to India in the EB-1 visa category may require making the category unavailable in the coming weeks

EB-2 Members of the Professions and Aliens of Exceptional Ability

  • EB-2 India remains unavailable
  • Except for China, all other countries will remain current

EB-2 Visa Bulletin Note: Sufficient demand and increased number use in the EB-2 visa category may make it necessary to retrogress the final action date or make the category unavailable in the coming months

EB-3 Professionals and Skilled Workers

  • EB-3 China will advance 10 days to January 1, 2022
  • Worldwide and Mexico will advance 1 month to September 1, 2024

Continue reading

by

Is your case stuck at the National Visa Center with no interview in sight? You are not alone. Thousands of applicants are waiting months—or even years—for their visa interviews to be scheduled. The good news is that you may have options. In this video, we discuss three proven strategies that could help push your NVC case forward.

Why are so many cases stuck at the National Visa Center for months—or even years?

The problem is a perfect storm of overwhelming case volume, limited availability of interview appointments, staffing shortages, and delays at U.S. consulates worldwide.

Even after a case is documentarily complete and ready to move forward, it can remain at the NVC for months—or longer—until the appropriate embassy has an available interview slot.

Sweeping visa restrictions have made the backlogs even worse. The Trump administration has fully or partially restricted entry and visa issuance for nationals of 39 countries, while immigrant visa issuance has been separately paused for nationals of 75 countries.

Although U.S. embassies may remain open and continue scheduling some interviews, affected visas generally cannot be issued while these restrictions remain in place.

The result is thousands of applicants left in limbo, with no clear timeline and little information about when their cases will finally move forward.

Continue reading

by

Imagine you are a green card holder planning summer travel with your family. You take your vacation, enjoy your trip, and return to the United States expecting to come home. But at the port of entry, CBP sends you to secondary inspection.

You have no criminal convictions. You only have pending charges — allegations that have not yet been proven. Still, CBP officers do not immediately allow you back into the country. Suddenly, your ability to reenter the United States is uncertain.

This is not science fiction. This is the reality created by a new Supreme Court decision that could make international travel riskier and more complicated for green card holders returning to the United States.

New Court Decision

That scenario is exactly why the Supreme Court’s decision in Blanche v. Lau matters. In that case, the Court held that a green card holder returning from international travel may face serious problems at the airport based on certain pending or alleged criminal conduct, even before there is a conviction.

The ruling does not mean that every pending charge will automatically result in denial of entry. However, it gives CBP and DHS more authority to treat certain returning green card holders as applicants seeking admission for the first time, rather than lawful permanent residents simply coming back home.

Before Lau

Before Blanche v. Lau, a lawful permanent resident generally had the right to return to the United States after temporary travel abroad, especially for trips under one year. In most cases, a green card holder only needed to answer questions confirming their identity and permanent resident status.

However, that right was not absolute. Immigration law has long allowed CBP to treat a green card holder as an “applicant for admission” in certain situations.

Continue reading

by

The new USCIS memo is finally showing its true colors.

Imagine coming to the U.S. legally, spending years doing everything right, and finally applying for your green card—only to be denied at the interview. Not because you are ineligible, but because a USCIS officer used the new USCIS memo to deny your case as a matter of discretion.

That’s exactly what happened in Michael’s case.

Real-Life Example: Green Card Denied Under the New USCIS Memo

Michael came to the United States legally 15 years ago on an F-1 student visa. Like many international students, he had plans to study, build a future, and follow the rules.

But life got difficult. Due to financial hardship and mental health struggles, Michael was unable to finish school. As a result, he fell out of F-1 status. To survive, he worked for a short period without authorization.

Years later, Michael married a U.S. citizen and applied for his green card through marriage.

At his green card interview, USCIS did not question whether their marriage was real. The problem was something else.

The officer told Michael that his green card would be denied under the new USCIS memo—not because he lacked eligibility through marriage, but because of the officer’s discretionary review of his past immigration violations. Continue reading

by

Good news for thousands of immigrants whose cases have been stuck in limbo: USCIS has resumed processing green card applications for nationals from 39 countries after a federal court ordered the agency to stop enforcing policies that had frozen thousands of cases.

For months, affected applicants faced uncertainty as green card applications, work permits, naturalization requests, and other immigration benefits remained stalled. Now, those cases are moving forward again.

But before anyone celebrates too soon, there’s a catch.

The federal government has already appealed the court’s ruling, meaning this legal battle is far from over. While USCIS is currently required to process these applications, future court decisions could change the landscape once again.

It’s also important to understand what this ruling does—and does not—do. The court ordered USCIS to resume adjudicating cases, but it did not order the agency to approve them. Applicants must still meet all eligibility requirements under U.S. immigration law.

Additionally, the judge’s order does not affect the separate temporary suspension of immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries, which remains in effect.

For individuals and families who have spent months waiting for updates, this decision offers a long-awaited opportunity to move their cases forward. Employers may also begin seeing progress on petitions and applications that were previously stalled.

Continue reading