Articles Posted in Criminal Record

by

Imagine waiting more than ten years as a lawful permanent resident for the day you can finally become a U.S. citizen.

One of our clients did exactly that. He received his N-400 citizenship interview notice, prepared for the appointment, and arrived at the USCIS office in Los Angeles excited about taking the next step toward naturalization. He believed he was eligible for citizenship, and his attorney had advised him that he qualified.

But he never walked out of that USCIS office as a new U.S. citizen.

Instead, ICE agents placed him in handcuffs and escorted him out of the building.

This is not a scene from a movie. It is a reality that some green card holders have faced when appearing for their naturalization interviews.

And he is not the only one.

Lessons From Real Client Cases

In this blog post, we share real client stories involving lawful permanent residents who appeared for their U.S. citizenship interviews only to be detained by ICE agents. These cases involve old removal orders, unpaid tickets that were forgotten and later turned into warrants, political activism that attracted government scrutiny, and other problems applicants may not realize could surface during the naturalization process.

Most importantly, we explain what these cases can teach other green card holders, and the steps you should take before filing your application.

What Happens at the N-400 Citizenship Interview

When you apply for U.S. citizenship, you file Form N-400, Application for Naturalization. At the interview, a USCIS officer will review your application with you and ask questions to confirm that the information you provided is accurate.

The officer may also review important parts of your immigration history, including your travel outside the United States, tax history, child support obligations, and any arrests, citations, charges, or other criminal issues. You will also be required to complete the English and civics portions of the naturalization test, unless you qualify for an exception.

At the end of the interview, USCIS may approve your application, continue the case because additional information or evidence is needed, or deny the application. An immediate denial at the interview itself is less common.

Continue reading

by

If you’re applying for U.S. citizenship in 2026 or beyond, pay close attention. Every year, hundreds of applicants are denied citizenship because of three common mistakes—and they have nothing to do with failing the civics test.

In this video, I’ll explain exactly what those three mistakes are. These are serious issues that can cause a USCIS officer to stop your interview, close your case, and ultimately deny your citizenship application.

What are the requirements to apply for U.S. citizenship?

Generally, a green-card holder must meet these requirements:

  1. Be at least 18 years old when filing Form N-400.
  2. Have been a lawful permanent resident for at least 5 years. There is a separate 3-year rule for certain applicants who obtained their green card through marriage to a U.S. Citizen
  3. Maintain continuous residence in the United States during the required 5-year or 3-year period. Long trips outside the U.S., especially trips of 6 months or longer, can create problems.
  4. Be physically present in the United States for at least 30 months of the previous 5 years. Under the 3-year marriage rule, the requirement is generally at least 18 months.
  5. Demonstrate good moral character. USCIS generally examines at least the statutory 5-year or 3-year period, although conduct from earlier periods can also be taken into account
  6. Demonstrate basic English ability by speaking, reading, and writing English, unless you qualify for an age/residency or disability exception.
  7. Pass the U.S. civics test, unless an exception applies. For N-400 applications filed on or after October 20, 2025, USCIS uses the 2025 naturalization civics test.

Continue reading

by

Imagine you are a green card holder planning summer travel with your family. You take your vacation, enjoy your trip, and return to the United States expecting to come home. But at the port of entry, CBP sends you to secondary inspection.

You have no criminal convictions. You only have pending charges — allegations that have not yet been proven. Still, CBP officers do not immediately allow you back into the country. Suddenly, your ability to reenter the United States is uncertain.

This is not science fiction. This is the reality created by a new Supreme Court decision that could make international travel riskier and more complicated for green card holders returning to the United States.

New Court Decision

That scenario is exactly why the Supreme Court’s decision in Blanche v. Lau matters. In that case, the Court held that a green card holder returning from international travel may face serious problems at the airport based on certain pending or alleged criminal conduct, even before there is a conviction.

The ruling does not mean that every pending charge will automatically result in denial of entry. However, it gives CBP and DHS more authority to treat certain returning green card holders as applicants seeking admission for the first time, rather than lawful permanent residents simply coming back home.

Before Lau

Before Blanche v. Lau, a lawful permanent resident generally had the right to return to the United States after temporary travel abroad, especially for trips under one year. In most cases, a green card holder only needed to answer questions confirming their identity and permanent resident status.

However, that right was not absolute. Immigration law has long allowed CBP to treat a green card holder as an “applicant for admission” in certain situations.

Continue reading

by

If you’ve made it to the green card interview stage, you’re closer than ever to becoming a lawful permanent resident—but it’s also the part that makes many applicants the most nervous. What actually happens in that room? What kinds of questions will they ask?

The green card interview is a chance for immigration officers to verify your application, confirm your eligibility, and ensure everything checks out. Still, the uncertainty can feel overwhelming if you don’t know what to expect.

In this guide, we’ll walk you through exactly what happens during a green card interview, from the moment you arrive to the types of questions you’ll be asked. Whether your application is based on marriage, family, or employment, understanding the process can help you feel more confident, prepared, and in control on the big day.

Importance of the Green Card Interview

The green card interview is one of the most critical steps in the immigration process because it’s where your entire application is reviewed face-to-face by an immigration officer. Up until this point, decisions are largely based on paperwork, but the interview allows the officer to verify your identity, confirm the accuracy of your information, and assess your eligibility in real time.

It’s also an opportunity for them to detect inconsistencies, clarify details, and, in certain cases—such as marriage-based applications—determine whether your relationship is genuine. A successful interview can lead directly to approval, while red flags or incomplete answers may delay your case or even result in denial, making preparation and honesty essential.

Nearly All Green Card Cases Require an Interview in 2026

As of 2026, the vast majority of green card applications now require a mandatory in-person interview as part of the application process. While some categories were previously eligible for interview waivers, changing immigration policies have made in-person review the standard rather than the exception.

This shift allows immigration officers to more thoroughly verify applicant information, assess eligibility, and detect potential inconsistencies or fraud. As a result, applicants across family-based, employment-based, and other categories should plan for an interview and prepare accordingly, treating it as a central step in securing permanent residency.

Continue reading

by

Still holding a green card in 2026? You might be missing out—big time. While lawful permanent residence offers stability, it also comes with limits that many immigrants don’t realize until it’s too late. From travel and tax exposure to voting rights and deportation risk, the gap between a green card and U.S. citizenship is wider than ever.

Here are five surprising differences that could make staying a permanent resident a costly mistake.

#1 Security & Deportation Concerns

One of the biggest risks of remaining a green card holder is that old criminal issues never truly disappear. Even offenses from years—or decades—ago can trigger detention or deportation if immigration laws or enforcement priorities shift.

Unlike U.S. citizens, permanent residents can be placed in removal proceedings based on past conduct—sometimes years later—making citizenship the only status that offers true long-term security from deportation. For example, a lawful permanent resident can now be detained without ever being convicted of a crime. Under the Laken Riley Act, non-citizens can face mandatory detention based solely on an arrest or charge, meaning an accusation alone can be enough to trigger custody.

Continue reading

by

Navigating the U.S. immigration system is difficult enough — but what many people don’t realize is that even legal immigrants can face deportation for mistakes they never knew were serious.

From minor paperwork oversights to everyday misunderstandings of immigration rules, these pitfalls can put lawful status at risk without warning.

In this guide, we break down the 7 most common mistakes that get even legal immigrants deported — and number 4 surprised even us. Understanding these risks is essential to protecting your future in the United States.

Mistake #1 Crimes of Moral Turpitude

Certain offenses—known as crimes involving moral turpitude—carry especially harsh consequences, including deportation, even for green card holders.

These crimes typically involve conduct considered dishonest, deceptive, or morally unacceptable, such as fraud, theft, domestic violence, or certain assault-related offenses.

What complicates things further is that even a single conviction could trigger removal proceedings for permanent residents and nonimmigrant visa holders.

Continue reading

by

Recent changes to the green card application process have added new hurdles that could make interview approvals more difficult. In this blog, we’ll break down what these changes are and how they could affect your chances of success.

What’s changed?

  • USCIS officers now have expanded authority
  • Immigration officers have been granted law enforcement powers as federal agents
  • Increased ability to investigate immigration cases for fraud, misrepresentation, and other violations
  • Authority to refer cases for criminal prosecution
  • Power to arrest and detain applicants during green card interviews for violations

USCIS Shifts from Administrative to Law Enforcement Agency

For decades, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has primarily served as an administrative agency. Its core function has been to process immigration benefits such as green cards, work permits, naturalization, and other legal status applications. USCIS operated separately from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which is tasked with enforcing immigration laws, including detaining and removing individuals who are in violation. This separation reflected a clear distinction between those applying for lawful immigration benefits and those facing enforcement actions.

However, in recent months, USCIS policies have started to shift in a direction that aligns more closely with immigration enforcement. Officers within the agency are being granted expanded authority, including certain law enforcement powers. For example, USCIS officers now have increased discretion to investigate cases for fraud, misrepresentation, or other immigration violations — and in some cases, they may refer cases for prosecution or even detain applicants during in-person interviews for immigration violations.

Continue reading

by

In a significant shift in immigration policy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) now has the authority to deny green card applications outright—without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID).

In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick explains how this new change empowers USCIS officers to make immediate decisions when an application lacks sufficient initial evidence, potentially leaving applicants with fewer opportunities to correct mistakes or provide missing documentation.

This makes the application process more unforgiving and raises the stakes for submitting a thorough and complete green card application from the start. Here’s what you need to know about how this policy could impact your green card journey, and more importantly how to protect yourself.

What’s changed?

Previously, when a green card application was submitted with missing or insufficient information, USCIS would typically issue a Request for Evidence (RFE). This notice outlined the specific issues or missing documents and gave the applicant a chance to respond and provide the necessary information to support their case by the specified deadline.

The RFE process served as a safeguard, allowing applicants to correct honest mistakes or oversights before a final decision was made on their application.

Now, that safeguard is no longer guaranteed. Under new USCIS policies, officers can deny green card applications outright if they determine the initial submission lacks sufficient evidence, without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID).

Continue reading

by

Navigating the U.S. immigration system can feel like walking through a legal minefield—especially when applying for a green card. What’s worse is that some of the most critical pitfalls are rarely discussed until it’s too late.

In this article, we’re uncovering five USCIS Green Card traps no one warns you about—from overlooked paperwork to silent deadlines that could derail your entire application.

Whether you’re applying through family, employment, or a special category, knowing these hidden risks could be the difference between receiving an approval or denial from USCIS.

#1 Incomplete or Incorrect Documents Submitted to USCIS

One of the most common and costly mistakes green card applicants make is submitting incomplete or incorrect documentation with your application. Even a small error, like a missing signature, outdated form version, or an incorrect fee, can result in delays, requests for evidence (RFEs), or even outright denial. Many applicants assume that minor details won’t matter, but USCIS officers are trained to scrutinize every page. Failing to double-check your forms, supporting documents, or filing fees can turn what should be a routine process into a months-long nightmare.

Real-Life Case Study: The Filing Fee Mistake That Led to Deportation

In a recent case, a green card applicant relied on advice from a notary who instructed them to submit a single check covering all required USCIS filing fees. Unfortunately, this was incorrect—USCIS required separate checks for different forms and was clearly stated on the form instructions. As a result, the entire application was rejected.

By the time the applicant received the rejection notice, they had already fallen out of legal status. This oversight triggered a deportation order that could have been easily avoided with proper filing.

This case illustrates how even seemingly minor administrative errors can have devastating, irreversible consequences. Always follow USCIS instructions carefully and consult a qualified immigration attorney when in doubt.

Continue reading

by

For many immigrants, attending a green card interview is a long-awaited step toward permanent residency in the United States. But in recent months, an increasing number of applicants have faced a troubling outcome—detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials at the green card interview with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

In this blog post, we share why this is happening, who is most at risk, and what immigrants should know before walking into their interview.

Immigration Enforcement on the Rise

Immigration enforcement has been on the rise nationwide, with federal authorities ramping up arrests, detentions, and deportations under increasingly aggressive policies. This uptick includes broader cooperation between local law enforcement and immigration agents, expanded use of surveillance technologies, and a growing number of workplace and home raids across multiple states.

These tactics have created a climate of fear, discouraging immigrants from accessing schools, places of work, and even hospitals. In Los Angeles, for example, a wave of coordinated ICE raids last month led to hundreds of arrests and heightened tensions.

ICE officers have also been arresting individuals immediately after their cases are dismissed in immigration court. These arrests have been reported nationwide and are discouraging immigrants from attending their scheduled court hearings.

Continue reading