Articles Posted in Policy Updates

by

On January 14, 2026, the State Department announced it is pausing the issuance of immigrant visas for nationals of 75 countries, effective January 21, 2026, while it develops a new process to assess whether applicants may become a “public charge” (financially dependent on the U.S. government).

Applicants can still apply and attend interviews, but no immigrant visas will not be issued during the pause. The policy affects family-sponsored and employment-based green cards, though dual nationals applying with a passport from a country not on the list are exempt from the suspension.

The policy change focuses on the statutory “public charge” ground of inadmissibility, which allows visa refusal in the event an applicant is found likely to depend on the U.S. government for financial assistance. Consular officers are permitted to consider factors such as an applicant’s health, age, education, employment prospects, and financial stability when evaluating if they are a public charge risk.

It is unclear how long the suspension will last or how the public charge review process will ultimately change.

Immigrant visa applicants from the affected countries should monitor communications from the State Department and prepare for potential delays in visa issuance.

Continue reading

by

If you’re a U.S. Green Card holder, you might think your permanent residency means smooth sailing through Customs and Border Protection (CBP) after returning from temporary foreign travel. But 2025 has brought some surprising developments that remind every lawful permanent resident (LPR) to be extra cautious. These changes might sound a little crazy—but ignoring them could cause big problems at the port of entry.

New CBP Policy—Mandatory Data Collection Practice

Starting December 26, 2025, CBP will roll out a new policy mandating the collection of biometric data from green card holders and noncitizens upon their entry to and departure from the United States.

This new policy requires all noncitizens, including green card holders, to have their photograph taken and potentially provide additional biometrics (such as fingerprints, iris scans, or voice prints) when entering or exiting the U.S. via land, sea or airports.

The regulation is intended to strengthen border security, reduce travel document fraud and ensure more accurate records of departures and arrivals; however, it also raises significant privacy considerations as agencies will collect, store, and process biometric data from large numbers of individuals.

Continue reading

by

On September 19, 2025, President Trump issued a presidential proclamation titled “Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers,” announcing new changes to the H-1B visa program. The proclamation imposes a $100,000 fee on all new H-1B petitions filed after 12:01 a.m. EDT on September 21, 2025, but leaves open the possibility of applying for national interest exceptions for those impacted.

According to the proclamation, the goal is to prioritize highly skilled and highly paid foreign workers while curbing abuse of the H-1B visa program for specialty occupations. The measure is set to remain in effect for 12 months unless extended.

The timing and language of the proclamation has caused widespread confusion and concern among employers, as well as both current and prospective H-1B workers. In response, the White House and federal agencies issued follow-up explanations, which have left many questions unanswered and even contradicted the text of the proclamation.

Policy Memorandums

In a memo published the day after the proclamation, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explained that the $100,000 fee applies only to new H-1B petitions filed after the September 21 effective date.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) similarly posted on X: “President Trump’s updated H-1B visa requirement applies only to new, prospective petitions that have not yet been filed. Petitions submitted prior to September 21, 2025, are not affected.”

In a separate statement, the State Department said, “The Proclamation’s restrictions on visa issuance and entry apply only to aliens seeking visa issuance or entry into the United States based on H-1B petitions filed with USCIS after the Proclamation’s effective date of September 21, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).”

To further clarify the proclamation’s impact, USCIS issued the following FAQs:

Continue reading

by

Recent changes to the green card application process have added new hurdles that could make interview approvals more difficult. In this blog, we’ll break down what these changes are and how they could affect your chances of success.

What’s changed?

  • USCIS officers now have expanded authority
  • Immigration officers have been granted law enforcement powers as federal agents
  • Increased ability to investigate immigration cases for fraud, misrepresentation, and other violations
  • Authority to refer cases for criminal prosecution
  • Power to arrest and detain applicants during green card interviews for violations

USCIS Shifts from Administrative to Law Enforcement Agency

For decades, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has primarily served as an administrative agency. Its core function has been to process immigration benefits such as green cards, work permits, naturalization, and other legal status applications. USCIS operated separately from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which is tasked with enforcing immigration laws, including detaining and removing individuals who are in violation. This separation reflected a clear distinction between those applying for lawful immigration benefits and those facing enforcement actions.

However, in recent months, USCIS policies have started to shift in a direction that aligns more closely with immigration enforcement. Officers within the agency are being granted expanded authority, including certain law enforcement powers. For example, USCIS officers now have increased discretion to investigate cases for fraud, misrepresentation, or other immigration violations — and in some cases, they may refer cases for prosecution or even detain applicants during in-person interviews for immigration violations.

Continue reading

by

As of August 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has resumed conducting personal investigations for certain naturalization applicants including home visits, neighborhood investigations, and visits at places of employment. These visits are part of the agency’s new efforts to verify the accuracy of information provided in citizenship applications and to prevent immigration fraud.

Highlights

  • Neighborhood Visit Policy Revived: USCIS has reinstated the neighborhood investigation policy after more than 30 years of limited or no enforcement.
  • Applies to Citizenship Applicants: This is a new development specifically affecting individuals applying for U.S. naturalization.
  • Focus on Verifying Eligibility: Neighborhood visits may be used to verify details such as residence, good moral character, and other naturalization requirements.
  • Supporting Documentation Encouraged: Applicants are advised to submit testimonial letters from neighbors, employers, or associates to potentially avoid in-person visits.

Policy Overview

Although neighborhood visits are not a new practice, they were generally suspended because USCIS relied on biometric checks and criminal history checks to determine an applicant’s good moral character and eligibility for naturalization. Their resurgence reflects a renewed emphasis on evaluating a person’s background to determine whether they possess “good moral character”—a requirement for citizenship. Officers may visit applicants’ residences to confirm details like physical presence, marital status (especially in spousal-based cases), and other eligibility requirements.

In practice, this is likely to occur if, after the USCIS citizenship interview, the officer remains unconvinced that the applicant demonstrates good moral character or meets other eligibility requirements.

Continue reading

by

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has ramped up its enforcement efforts against individuals who have falsely claimed U.S. citizenship.

In a new policy memorandum issued on August 20, 2025, USCIS clarified that making a false claim to U.S. citizenship is a serious immigration violation that results in a permanent lifetime bar to adjustment of status—and, in most cases, there is no available waiver to overcome this ground of inadmissibility.

The policy memo explains that an immigration officer may find someone inadmissible for a false claim to U.S. citizenship, if the person made the claim with the subjective intent to gain a benefit or purpose under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) or any other federal or state law.

This requires an officer to consider direct or circumstantial evidence to determine whether the individual had the subjective intent to gain such a benefit or purpose based on the following factors: age, level of education, background, mental capacity, level of understanding, appreciation of the difference between truth and falsity, and other relevant circumstances.

Continue reading

by

In a significant shift in immigration policy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) now has the authority to deny green card applications outright—without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID).

In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick explains how this new change empowers USCIS officers to make immediate decisions when an application lacks sufficient initial evidence, potentially leaving applicants with fewer opportunities to correct mistakes or provide missing documentation.

This makes the application process more unforgiving and raises the stakes for submitting a thorough and complete green card application from the start. Here’s what you need to know about how this policy could impact your green card journey, and more importantly how to protect yourself.

What’s changed?

Previously, when a green card application was submitted with missing or insufficient information, USCIS would typically issue a Request for Evidence (RFE). This notice outlined the specific issues or missing documents and gave the applicant a chance to respond and provide the necessary information to support their case by the specified deadline.

The RFE process served as a safeguard, allowing applicants to correct honest mistakes or oversights before a final decision was made on their application.

Now, that safeguard is no longer guaranteed. Under new USCIS policies, officers can deny green card applications outright if they determine the initial submission lacks sufficient evidence, without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID).

Continue reading

by

In a sharp escalation of his hardline immigration policies, President Trump has recently turned his attention toward lawful permanent residents, sparking alarm among green card holders with the right to live and work in the United States permanently.

While Trump’s immigration policies during his first term in office primarily targeted undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers, this time his administration is taking a more aggressive approach, aimed at even those who have followed legal pathways to U.S. permanent residency. By now you have seen the headlines in the news detailing heightened scrutiny and enforcement measures against green card holders by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Understanding why Trump is now targeting green card holders requires taking a closer look at his administration’s policies and what this means for the future of immigration under President Trump.

Overview

Under President Trump’s current administration, green card holders are being treated like guests, with the privilege of having the ability to live and work in the United States. But that privilege can be placed under scrutiny if lawful permanent residents violate their legal status.

This is because of the administration’s new “Catch and Revoke” policy, introduced by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, establishing a stringent “one-strike” rule targeting non-citizens, including green card holders, visa recipients, and parolees.

Under this new policy, any legal violation by non-citizens—ranging from minor infractions to more serious offenses—can lead to the immediate revocation of immigration status and potential deportation.

Continue reading

by

Over the past month, a new wave of visa revocations has caused panic among F-1 international students at college campuses nationwide.

In this video you will learn about what is happening, which students are being impacted, and how you can protect your immigration status moving forward.

Here’s What We Know

Without any prior notification, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been revoking visas and terminating SEVIS records for the following individuals:

  • Students who have had encounters with law enforcement
  • Students with criminal charges that have been dismissed
  • Students with very old misdemeanors pre-dating their most recent visa issuance
  • Students who have engaged in pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses and
  • Where the government learns that a student is working without lawful authorization

School officials first became aware of terminated F-1 student records after conducting routine checks of the Student & Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS). Still others became aware of their SEVIS termination after receiving an email directly from the State Department.

Why it’s Important

A student’s visa is the key that allows students to enter the United States, but their SEVIS record (known as Form I-20 Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant Student Status) is what determines their ability to remain inside the country. Students are allowed to remain until their “Admit Until Date” or D/S Duration of Status. This means a student can remain in the U.S. for as long as they comply with the terms of their F-1 visa.

Once an F-1 student’s SEVIS record is terminated, they automatically lose lawful status and are subject to removal from the United States if they do not leave the U.S. immediately. Under the Trump administration, F-1 visa holders admitted for “duration of status” begin accruing unlawful presence the day after their status ends.

Continue reading

by

Did you know that you can apply for a green card without a job offer or even sponsorship from a U.S. employer?

In this video attorney Jacob Sapochnick tells you all you need to know about the EB-2 National Interest Waiver, an employment-based green card option for professionals who are working in an area of national importance to the United States government.

This video focuses specifically on how engineering professionals can qualify for the National Interest Waiver, which is one of the most popular ways to obtain permanent residence in the U.S.

For more information, please keep on watching.

Overview

If you are an engineer that has earned an advanced degree (baccalaureate or higher) or have exceptional ability in your field of engineering, then you may be eligible to self-petition for a green card by applying for the EB-2 National Interest Waiver.

Unlike the EB-3 employment-based green card which requires employment sponsorship, the EB-2 National interest Waiver allows an individual to self-petition for their green card.

This provides applicants with the freedom and flexibility to apply for permanent residence on their own without having to undergo the lengthy labor certification process with a U.S. employer.

Continue reading