Articles Posted in Policy Updates

by

Imagine you’re working in the United States on a visa such as an H-1B, L-1, or TN and suddenly lose your job. Under current rules, you may have up to 60 days to find a new employer, change to another immigration status, or leave the United States.

Now, DHS is proposing to eliminate that 60-day grace period for certain employment-based visa holders. If the proposal is finalized, affected workers could have far less time to take action after their employment ends.

What the Rule Says Today

Under the current rule, H-1B workers generally have up to 60 days after losing or leaving a job to find a new employer, change to another immigration status, or make arrangements to leave the United States. This is known as the 60-day “grace period.” Under the proposed rule, that protection would disappear, meaning workers could begin falling out of status as soon as the day after their employment ends.

Who is Affected

The proposal would affect workers in these nonimmigrant visa categories:

  • E-1 treaty traders
  • E-2 treaty investors and qualifying employees
  • E-3 Australian specialty occupation workers
  • H-1B specialty occupation workers
  • H-1B1 workers from Chile and Singapore
  • L-1 intracompany transferees
  • O-1 individuals with extraordinary ability or achievement
  • TN professionals from Canada and Mexico

It would apply when employment or the qualifying activity underlying that status ends, whether the worker is terminated, laid off, or voluntarily leaves the job.

They generally would be considered to have failed to maintain status beginning the day after their employment ends unless they have some other lawful basis to remain in the United States.

Continue reading

by

USCIS recently introduced an important change affecting green card applicants who rely on a sponsor to meet the financial requirements for the I-864 Affidavit of Support.

Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, is a legally binding form used to show that a green card applicant has sufficient financial support and is unlikely to become a public charge. The sponsor of the I-864 is generally the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident who filed the immigrant petition. If the petitioner does not meet the income requirement for their household size, a joint sponsor may be needed.

Under new USCIS policies, sponsors and joint sponsors are now required to provide additional financial information, including their credit score and credit report.

USCIS has also released a new edition of Form I-864 reflecting these changes, which will be required beginning October 1.

Why does this matter?

A sponsor or joint sponsor with poor credit, high debt, late payments, collections, or bankruptcy could face greater scrutiny because USCIS may question whether they are financially capable of supporting the intending immigrant. This could result in requests for additional evidence, processing delays, or a determination that the sponsor or joint sponsor does not qualify.

If a sponsor has a credit or security freeze in place, USCIS may be unable to access the information needed to evaluate Form I-864.

Continue reading

by

The days of mailing immigration applications to USCIS may soon be coming to an end.

A new rule effective August 11th gives USCIS the power to require certain immigration forms to be filed electronically instead of on paper.

This is changing how immigration cases are filed and how applicants move through the process. As USCIS shifts more forms online, we can expect confusion, filing mistakes, and cases being rejected for failing to follow the new electronic filing requirements.

In this blog, we will explain why USCIS is making this change, when the new rule will begin affecting applicants, and what you can do now to prepare for mandatory online filing.

What Is the New Rule About?

USCIS will be able to require certain immigration forms, supporting documents, and filing fees to be submitted electronically instead of by mail. This is similar to the way in with the U.S. Department of State has required online filing of visa applications where applicants are required to submit electronic forms to DOS through its online system, Consular Electronic Application Center.

Once USCIS makes online filing mandatory for a particular form, applicants will generally have to complete the entire filing through a USCIS online account unless they qualify for a limited exception or waiver.

USCIS must provide at least 60 days’ notice before requiring a specific form to be filed electronically.

Continue reading

by

On May 21, 2026, USCIS issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199, signaling a major change in how green card applications filed inside the United States (known as Adjustment of Status) may be reviewed. The memo emphasizes that Adjustment of Status (AOS) is not an automatic benefit, even when an applicant meets all legal eligibility requirements.

Instead, USCIS officers are instructed to conduct a broader discretionary review known as a “totality of the circumstances” evaluation to consider whether the applicant should complete the immigrant visa process abroad through a U.S. consulate instead.

The policy effectively shifts AOS from being viewed as a routine pathway for eligible applicants to being treated as an “extraordinary” discretionary form of relief.

What’s changed: USCIS officers are directed to weigh both positive and negative factors on a case-by-case basis when deciding whether to approve a green card application.

The memo will lead to increased scrutiny at green card interviews, and the issuance of more requests for evidence. Certain applicants may even be forced to pursue consular processing abroad rather than adjusting status from within the United States.

Continue reading

by

On January 14, 2026, the State Department announced it is pausing the issuance of immigrant visas for nationals of 75 countries, effective January 21, 2026, while it develops a new process to assess whether applicants may become a “public charge” (financially dependent on the U.S. government).

Applicants can still apply and attend interviews, but no immigrant visas will not be issued during the pause. The policy affects family-sponsored and employment-based green cards, though dual nationals applying with a passport from a country not on the list are exempt from the suspension.

The policy change focuses on the statutory “public charge” ground of inadmissibility, which allows visa refusal in the event an applicant is found likely to depend on the U.S. government for financial assistance. Consular officers are permitted to consider factors such as an applicant’s health, age, education, employment prospects, and financial stability when evaluating if they are a public charge risk.

It is unclear how long the suspension will last or how the public charge review process will ultimately change.

Immigrant visa applicants from the affected countries should monitor communications from the State Department and prepare for potential delays in visa issuance.

Continue reading

by

If you’re a U.S. Green Card holder, you might think your permanent residency means smooth sailing through Customs and Border Protection (CBP) after returning from temporary foreign travel. But 2025 has brought some surprising developments that remind every lawful permanent resident (LPR) to be extra cautious. These changes might sound a little crazy—but ignoring them could cause big problems at the port of entry.

New CBP Policy—Mandatory Data Collection Practice

Starting December 26, 2025, CBP will roll out a new policy mandating the collection of biometric data from green card holders and noncitizens upon their entry to and departure from the United States.

This new policy requires all noncitizens, including green card holders, to have their photograph taken and potentially provide additional biometrics (such as fingerprints, iris scans, or voice prints) when entering or exiting the U.S. via land, sea or airports.

The regulation is intended to strengthen border security, reduce travel document fraud and ensure more accurate records of departures and arrivals; however, it also raises significant privacy considerations as agencies will collect, store, and process biometric data from large numbers of individuals.

Continue reading

by

On September 19, 2025, President Trump issued a presidential proclamation titled “Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers,” announcing new changes to the H-1B visa program. The proclamation imposes a $100,000 fee on all new H-1B petitions filed after 12:01 a.m. EDT on September 21, 2025, but leaves open the possibility of applying for national interest exceptions for those impacted.

According to the proclamation, the goal is to prioritize highly skilled and highly paid foreign workers while curbing abuse of the H-1B visa program for specialty occupations. The measure is set to remain in effect for 12 months unless extended.

The timing and language of the proclamation has caused widespread confusion and concern among employers, as well as both current and prospective H-1B workers. In response, the White House and federal agencies issued follow-up explanations, which have left many questions unanswered and even contradicted the text of the proclamation.

Policy Memorandums

In a memo published the day after the proclamation, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explained that the $100,000 fee applies only to new H-1B petitions filed after the September 21 effective date.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) similarly posted on X: “President Trump’s updated H-1B visa requirement applies only to new, prospective petitions that have not yet been filed. Petitions submitted prior to September 21, 2025, are not affected.”

In a separate statement, the State Department said, “The Proclamation’s restrictions on visa issuance and entry apply only to aliens seeking visa issuance or entry into the United States based on H-1B petitions filed with USCIS after the Proclamation’s effective date of September 21, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).”

To further clarify the proclamation’s impact, USCIS issued the following FAQs:

Continue reading

by

Recent changes to the green card application process have added new hurdles that could make interview approvals more difficult. In this blog, we’ll break down what these changes are and how they could affect your chances of success.

What’s changed?

  • USCIS officers now have expanded authority
  • Immigration officers have been granted law enforcement powers as federal agents
  • Increased ability to investigate immigration cases for fraud, misrepresentation, and other violations
  • Authority to refer cases for criminal prosecution
  • Power to arrest and detain applicants during green card interviews for violations

USCIS Shifts from Administrative to Law Enforcement Agency

For decades, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has primarily served as an administrative agency. Its core function has been to process immigration benefits such as green cards, work permits, naturalization, and other legal status applications. USCIS operated separately from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which is tasked with enforcing immigration laws, including detaining and removing individuals who are in violation. This separation reflected a clear distinction between those applying for lawful immigration benefits and those facing enforcement actions.

However, in recent months, USCIS policies have started to shift in a direction that aligns more closely with immigration enforcement. Officers within the agency are being granted expanded authority, including certain law enforcement powers. For example, USCIS officers now have increased discretion to investigate cases for fraud, misrepresentation, or other immigration violations — and in some cases, they may refer cases for prosecution or even detain applicants during in-person interviews for immigration violations.

Continue reading

by

As of August 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has resumed conducting personal investigations for certain naturalization applicants including home visits, neighborhood investigations, and visits at places of employment. These visits are part of the agency’s new efforts to verify the accuracy of information provided in citizenship applications and to prevent immigration fraud.

Highlights

  • Neighborhood Visit Policy Revived: USCIS has reinstated the neighborhood investigation policy after more than 30 years of limited or no enforcement.
  • Applies to Citizenship Applicants: This is a new development specifically affecting individuals applying for U.S. naturalization.
  • Focus on Verifying Eligibility: Neighborhood visits may be used to verify details such as residence, good moral character, and other naturalization requirements.
  • Supporting Documentation Encouraged: Applicants are advised to submit testimonial letters from neighbors, employers, or associates to potentially avoid in-person visits.

Policy Overview

Although neighborhood visits are not a new practice, they were generally suspended because USCIS relied on biometric checks and criminal history checks to determine an applicant’s good moral character and eligibility for naturalization. Their resurgence reflects a renewed emphasis on evaluating a person’s background to determine whether they possess “good moral character”—a requirement for citizenship. Officers may visit applicants’ residences to confirm details like physical presence, marital status (especially in spousal-based cases), and other eligibility requirements.

In practice, this is likely to occur if, after the USCIS citizenship interview, the officer remains unconvinced that the applicant demonstrates good moral character or meets other eligibility requirements.

Continue reading

by

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has ramped up its enforcement efforts against individuals who have falsely claimed U.S. citizenship.

In a new policy memorandum issued on August 20, 2025, USCIS clarified that making a false claim to U.S. citizenship is a serious immigration violation that results in a permanent lifetime bar to adjustment of status—and, in most cases, there is no available waiver to overcome this ground of inadmissibility.

The policy memo explains that an immigration officer may find someone inadmissible for a false claim to U.S. citizenship, if the person made the claim with the subjective intent to gain a benefit or purpose under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) or any other federal or state law.

This requires an officer to consider direct or circumstantial evidence to determine whether the individual had the subjective intent to gain such a benefit or purpose based on the following factors: age, level of education, background, mental capacity, level of understanding, appreciation of the difference between truth and falsity, and other relevant circumstances.

Continue reading