Articles Posted in Lawful Permanent Residents

by

As of August 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has resumed conducting personal investigations for certain naturalization applicants including home visits, neighborhood investigations, and visits at places of employment. These visits are part of the agency’s new efforts to verify the accuracy of information provided in citizenship applications and to prevent immigration fraud.

Highlights

  • Neighborhood Visit Policy Revived: USCIS has reinstated the neighborhood investigation policy after more than 30 years of limited or no enforcement.
  • Applies to Citizenship Applicants: This is a new development specifically affecting individuals applying for U.S. naturalization.
  • Focus on Verifying Eligibility: Neighborhood visits may be used to verify details such as residence, good moral character, and other naturalization requirements.
  • Supporting Documentation Encouraged: Applicants are advised to submit testimonial letters from neighbors, employers, or associates to potentially avoid in-person visits.

Policy Overview

Although neighborhood visits are not a new practice, they were generally suspended because USCIS relied on biometric checks and criminal history checks to determine an applicant’s good moral character and eligibility for naturalization. Their resurgence reflects a renewed emphasis on evaluating a person’s background to determine whether they possess “good moral character”—a requirement for citizenship. Officers may visit applicants’ residences to confirm details like physical presence, marital status (especially in spousal-based cases), and other eligibility requirements.

In practice, this is likely to occur if, after the USCIS citizenship interview, the officer remains unconvinced that the applicant demonstrates good moral character or meets other eligibility requirements.

Continue reading

by

In a significant shift in immigration policy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) now has the authority to deny green card applications outright—without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID).

In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick explains how this new change empowers USCIS officers to make immediate decisions when an application lacks sufficient initial evidence, potentially leaving applicants with fewer opportunities to correct mistakes or provide missing documentation.

This makes the application process more unforgiving and raises the stakes for submitting a thorough and complete green card application from the start. Here’s what you need to know about how this policy could impact your green card journey, and more importantly how to protect yourself.

What’s changed?

Previously, when a green card application was submitted with missing or insufficient information, USCIS would typically issue a Request for Evidence (RFE). This notice outlined the specific issues or missing documents and gave the applicant a chance to respond and provide the necessary information to support their case by the specified deadline.

The RFE process served as a safeguard, allowing applicants to correct honest mistakes or oversights before a final decision was made on their application.

Now, that safeguard is no longer guaranteed. Under new USCIS policies, officers can deny green card applications outright if they determine the initial submission lacks sufficient evidence, without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID).

Continue reading

by

In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick explains why immigrant visa numbers are no longer available for certain visa categories for the rest of fiscal year 2025, as the annual limit on visa issuances has already been reached, well before the fiscal year’s end on September 30.

This news affects workers awaiting green card approval, employers navigating sponsorship timelines, and helps green card applicants manage their expectations.

In this blog post, we’ll break down what this means, why it happened, and what those affected can expect moving forward as the immigration system resets on October 1st for the next fiscal year.

What is visa number management in immigration?

First, let’s discuss visa number management in immigration.

This refers to the process by which the U.S. government tracks and allocates the limited number of immigrant visa numbers available each fiscal year. These numbers are divided across various categories, including family-based and employment-based immigration, and are subject to annual limits on visa issuance set by Congress.

Why are there annual limits on visas?

Proper visa number management ensures that the limited supply of visas is distributed fairly and efficiently among the various visa categories and countries each year. It also helps the government plan and monitor immigration flows, while giving applicants and employers a clearer picture of potential wait times and availability.

Who manages visa issuance?

The U.S. Department of State, in coordination with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), is responsible for issuing annual visa numbers. Each month, the State Department publishes the Visa Bulletin, which outlines visa number availability and priority date cutoffs, helping applicants determine when they may proceed with their green card applications.

Since the demand for visas significantly exceeds the annual supply, the State Department imposes “cutoff dates” where individuals must wait in line for a visa. Typically, the majority of visa categories reach their limits by the summer months. When this occurs, no additional visas can be issued until the start of the new fiscal year on October 1st.

Continue reading

by

Are you applying for an immigrant visa and want to know when your priority date will become current? Then you won’t want to miss our analysis of the August 2025 Visa Bulletin.

In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick explains what you can expect to see in terms of the movement of the family-sponsored and employment-based visa categories in the month of August.

USCIS Adjustment of Status

For employment-based preference categories, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has confirmed it will continue to use the Final Action Dates chart to determine filing eligibility for adjustment of status to permanent residence in the month of August.

For family-sponsored preference categories, USCIS will also continue to use the Dates for Filing chart to determine filing eligibility for adjustment of status to permanent residence in the month of August.

Please click here for more information.

Highlights of the August 2025 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of August?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

EB-2 Members of the Professions and Aliens of Exceptional Ability

  • EB-2 Worldwide, Mexico, Philippines retrogressed by 1.4 months to September 1, 2023

EB-3 Professionals and Skilled Workers and Other Workers

  • EB-3 India will advance by 1 month to May 22, 2013

EB-5 Unreserved Categories (C5, T5, I5, and R5)

  • India will advance by 6.5 months to November 15, 2019
  • China will advance by 22.5 months to December 08, 2015

Continue reading

by

Navigating the U.S. immigration system can feel like walking through a legal minefield—especially when applying for a green card. What’s worse is that some of the most critical pitfalls are rarely discussed until it’s too late.

In this article, we’re uncovering five USCIS Green Card traps no one warns you about—from overlooked paperwork to silent deadlines that could derail your entire application.

Whether you’re applying through family, employment, or a special category, knowing these hidden risks could be the difference between receiving an approval or denial from USCIS.

#1 Incomplete or Incorrect Documents Submitted to USCIS

One of the most common and costly mistakes green card applicants make is submitting incomplete or incorrect documentation with your application. Even a small error, like a missing signature, outdated form version, or an incorrect fee, can result in delays, requests for evidence (RFEs), or even outright denial. Many applicants assume that minor details won’t matter, but USCIS officers are trained to scrutinize every page. Failing to double-check your forms, supporting documents, or filing fees can turn what should be a routine process into a months-long nightmare.

Real-Life Case Study: The Filing Fee Mistake That Led to Deportation

In a recent case, a green card applicant relied on advice from a notary who instructed them to submit a single check covering all required USCIS filing fees. Unfortunately, this was incorrect—USCIS required separate checks for different forms and was clearly stated on the form instructions. As a result, the entire application was rejected.

By the time the applicant received the rejection notice, they had already fallen out of legal status. This oversight triggered a deportation order that could have been easily avoided with proper filing.

This case illustrates how even seemingly minor administrative errors can have devastating, irreversible consequences. Always follow USCIS instructions carefully and consult a qualified immigration attorney when in doubt.

Continue reading

by

On June 9, 2025, President Trump’s new travel ban took effect, blocking or limiting entry of nationals from 19 countries with limited exceptions. Framed as a national security measure, the order expands on his earlier bans, targeting nationals from countries with high visa overstay rates or those with limited cooperation with U.S. immigration enforcement.

Who is Impacted?

Full Suspension on 12 Country Nationals

Effective June 9th the travel ban suspends the entry of both immigrants and non-immigrants from 12 designated countries who are outside the United States and do not have a valid visa on the effective date of the proclamation, including Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

However, several key exceptions apply for lawful permanent residents (LPRs), immediate family members of U.S. citizens, dual nationals, athletes and teams competing in major international sporting events such as the World Cup and the Olympics, and others (a full list of exceptions is provided below).

Partial Suspension on 7 Country Nationals

A separate provision of Trump’s travel ban also imposes heightened visa restrictions on nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela who are outside of the United States and don’t hold a valid visa.

For individuals from these countries, entry into the U.S. is suspended for both immigrant and nonimmigrant travelers holding B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M, or J visas. Consular officers are directed to limit the validity of any other nonimmigrant visas issued to these nationals to the extent permitted by law.

Continue reading

by

If you have a pending application with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), it’s important to stay informed as policies continue to shift under the Trump administration.

Recent changes in immigration enforcement and USCIS procedures may directly affect how your application is reviewed, how long the process takes, and even whether additional information or interviews may be required.

Understanding these policy changes can help you better prepare, avoid unnecessary delays, and ensure that your application remains compliant with these changing policies.

Detentions at Green Card and Naturalization Interviews

Recent reports indicate a concerning trend of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detaining individuals during green card and naturalization interviews at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) field offices.

Under the Trump administration, there has been an uptick in such incidents, raising alarm among the immigrant community. For instance, in April a Danish national and father of four, was arrested by ICE during his USCIS citizenship interview in Memphis, Tennessee, due to a missed paperwork deadline from 2015. Despite having no criminal record, he was denied bail and remains detained.

Similarly, a Palestinian student at Columbia University, was detained by ICE during his USCIS naturalization interview in Vermont. His arrest, reportedly linked to his pro-Palestinian activism, sparked legal challenges and debates over constitutional rights.

Continue reading

by

If you have a petition pending with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), you may be wondering why the agency is taking so long to process immigration and naturalization applications.

In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick discusses the main factors contributing to slow processing times and highlights the anticipated rise in wait times in 2025.

Overview

Several key factors have contributed to the slow processing times at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) during the Trump administration.

Below are some of the most significant reasons, based on insider information shared by a former USCIS officer.

Reduction in Staff and Budgetary Constraints

Employee layoffs and budgetary constraints have led to understaffed USCIS offices, reducing the agency’s ability to process applications efficiently. Trump’s return to the White House has increased staffing reductions, making it difficult for the agency to balance its workload.

Sub-Optimal Staffing and Capacity

USCIS operates with insufficient personnel to handle rising application volumes, and many offices (such as those processing green card applications) face staffing shortages or lack adequate training, reducing overall processing efficiency.

Continue reading

by

Are you applying for an immigrant visa and want to know when your priority date will become current? Then you won’t want to miss our analysis of the June 2025 Visa Bulletin.

In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick explains what you can expect to see in terms of the movement of the family-sponsored and employment-based visa categories in the month of June.

USCIS Adjustment of Status

For employment-based preference categories, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has confirmed it will continue to use the Final Action Dates chart to determine filing eligibility for adjustment of status to permanent residence in the month of June.

For family-sponsored preference categories, USCIS will also continue to use the Dates for Filing chart to determine filing eligibility for adjustment of status to permanent residence in the month of June.

Please click here for more information.

Continue reading

by

In a sharp escalation of his hardline immigration policies, President Trump has recently turned his attention toward lawful permanent residents, sparking alarm among green card holders with the right to live and work in the United States permanently.

While Trump’s immigration policies during his first term in office primarily targeted undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers, this time his administration is taking a more aggressive approach, aimed at even those who have followed legal pathways to U.S. permanent residency. By now you have seen the headlines in the news detailing heightened scrutiny and enforcement measures against green card holders by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Understanding why Trump is now targeting green card holders requires taking a closer look at his administration’s policies and what this means for the future of immigration under President Trump.

Overview

Under President Trump’s current administration, green card holders are being treated like guests, with the privilege of having the ability to live and work in the United States. But that privilege can be placed under scrutiny if lawful permanent residents violate their legal status.

This is because of the administration’s new “Catch and Revoke” policy, introduced by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, establishing a stringent “one-strike” rule targeting non-citizens, including green card holders, visa recipients, and parolees.

Under this new policy, any legal violation by non-citizens—ranging from minor infractions to more serious offenses—can lead to the immediate revocation of immigration status and potential deportation.

Continue reading