Articles Posted in Donald Trump

by

In this video we discuss five emerging trends in 2025 that are likely to affect U.S. green card holders — they reflect changes and risks that are gaining traction.

If you’re a green card holder—or hoping to become one—you need to know that getting arrested for driving under the influence, accumulating speeding tickets, not paying taxes, or even prolonged absences from the United States can have serious consequences for your status.

What to Avoid

To stay off the radar of immigration enforcement—especially under stricter policies—it’s crucial to avoid any legal troubles that could flag your record. This means steering clear of DUIs, repeated traffic violations like speeding tickets, and making sure you’re fully compliant with tax filings. Also, be cautious with international travel. Extended or frequent trips abroad without proper documentation can raise red flags.

Staying law-abiding, keeping your paperwork in order, and consulting an immigration lawyer if issues arise are the best ways to minimize risk and protect your status.

Here’s what you need to know.

Continue reading

by

On September 19th President Trump signed an executive order establishing the Gold Card (EO 14351)—a new visa program allowing foreign nationals who make a $1 million nonrefundable gift to the U.S. Department of Commerce—or $2 million if made by a corporation or other entity on their behalf—to qualify for expedited immigrant visa processing.

These gifts are treated as evidence of “exceptional business ability” or “national benefit” when applying under employment-based immigrant visa categories, such as EB-1 or EB-2 (including national interest waivers). Federal agencies have 90 days to implement the program, including setting up application procedures, fees, and adjustment-of-status mechanisms.

Looking ahead, the Trump administration is reportedly considering the rollout of a “Platinum Card” program. This initiative would allow individuals to contribute $5 million in exchange for the ability to live in the United States for up to 270 days per year, without being taxed on their foreign income. However, no official details have been released at this time.

Is the Gold Card Set to Replace the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program?

The big question many are asking is whether the Gold Card will ultimately replace the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program.

According to the latest announcement, the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program will continue operating separately from the Gold Card.

Continue reading

by

On September 19, 2025, President Trump issued a presidential proclamation titled “Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers,” announcing new changes to the H-1B visa program. The proclamation imposes a $100,000 fee on all new H-1B petitions filed after 12:01 a.m. EDT on September 21, 2025, but leaves open the possibility of applying for national interest exceptions for those impacted.

According to the proclamation, the goal is to prioritize highly skilled and highly paid foreign workers while curbing abuse of the H-1B visa program for specialty occupations. The measure is set to remain in effect for 12 months unless extended.

The timing and language of the proclamation has caused widespread confusion and concern among employers, as well as both current and prospective H-1B workers. In response, the White House and federal agencies issued follow-up explanations, which have left many questions unanswered and even contradicted the text of the proclamation.

Policy Memorandums

In a memo published the day after the proclamation, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explained that the $100,000 fee applies only to new H-1B petitions filed after the September 21 effective date.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) similarly posted on X: “President Trump’s updated H-1B visa requirement applies only to new, prospective petitions that have not yet been filed. Petitions submitted prior to September 21, 2025, are not affected.”

In a separate statement, the State Department said, “The Proclamation’s restrictions on visa issuance and entry apply only to aliens seeking visa issuance or entry into the United States based on H-1B petitions filed with USCIS after the Proclamation’s effective date of September 21, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).”

To further clarify the proclamation’s impact, USCIS issued the following FAQs:

Continue reading

by

Recent changes to the green card application process have added new hurdles that could make interview approvals more difficult. In this blog, we’ll break down what these changes are and how they could affect your chances of success.

What’s changed?

  • USCIS officers now have expanded authority
  • Immigration officers have been granted law enforcement powers as federal agents
  • Increased ability to investigate immigration cases for fraud, misrepresentation, and other violations
  • Authority to refer cases for criminal prosecution
  • Power to arrest and detain applicants during green card interviews for violations

USCIS Shifts from Administrative to Law Enforcement Agency

For decades, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has primarily served as an administrative agency. Its core function has been to process immigration benefits such as green cards, work permits, naturalization, and other legal status applications. USCIS operated separately from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which is tasked with enforcing immigration laws, including detaining and removing individuals who are in violation. This separation reflected a clear distinction between those applying for lawful immigration benefits and those facing enforcement actions.

However, in recent months, USCIS policies have started to shift in a direction that aligns more closely with immigration enforcement. Officers within the agency are being granted expanded authority, including certain law enforcement powers. For example, USCIS officers now have increased discretion to investigate cases for fraud, misrepresentation, or other immigration violations — and in some cases, they may refer cases for prosecution or even detain applicants during in-person interviews for immigration violations.

Continue reading

by

As of August 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has resumed conducting personal investigations for certain naturalization applicants including home visits, neighborhood investigations, and visits at places of employment. These visits are part of the agency’s new efforts to verify the accuracy of information provided in citizenship applications and to prevent immigration fraud.

Highlights

  • Neighborhood Visit Policy Revived: USCIS has reinstated the neighborhood investigation policy after more than 30 years of limited or no enforcement.
  • Applies to Citizenship Applicants: This is a new development specifically affecting individuals applying for U.S. naturalization.
  • Focus on Verifying Eligibility: Neighborhood visits may be used to verify details such as residence, good moral character, and other naturalization requirements.
  • Supporting Documentation Encouraged: Applicants are advised to submit testimonial letters from neighbors, employers, or associates to potentially avoid in-person visits.

Policy Overview

Although neighborhood visits are not a new practice, they were generally suspended because USCIS relied on biometric checks and criminal history checks to determine an applicant’s good moral character and eligibility for naturalization. Their resurgence reflects a renewed emphasis on evaluating a person’s background to determine whether they possess “good moral character”—a requirement for citizenship. Officers may visit applicants’ residences to confirm details like physical presence, marital status (especially in spousal-based cases), and other eligibility requirements.

In practice, this is likely to occur if, after the USCIS citizenship interview, the officer remains unconvinced that the applicant demonstrates good moral character or meets other eligibility requirements.

Continue reading

by

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has ramped up its enforcement efforts against individuals who have falsely claimed U.S. citizenship.

In a new policy memorandum issued on August 20, 2025, USCIS clarified that making a false claim to U.S. citizenship is a serious immigration violation that results in a permanent lifetime bar to adjustment of status—and, in most cases, there is no available waiver to overcome this ground of inadmissibility.

The policy memo explains that an immigration officer may find someone inadmissible for a false claim to U.S. citizenship, if the person made the claim with the subjective intent to gain a benefit or purpose under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) or any other federal or state law.

This requires an officer to consider direct or circumstantial evidence to determine whether the individual had the subjective intent to gain such a benefit or purpose based on the following factors: age, level of education, background, mental capacity, level of understanding, appreciation of the difference between truth and falsity, and other relevant circumstances.

Continue reading

by

In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick discusses new changes to the U.S. visa interview waiver policy announced by the State Department and what visa applicants need to know moving forward.

Effective September 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of State is making significant changes to the categories of applicants eligible for a nonimmigrant visa interview waiver. Under the new policy, most applicants, including children under 14 and seniors over 79, will generally be required to appear for an in-person interview with a U.S. consular officer—with a few notable exceptions.

These changes override the previous Interview Waiver Update issued on February 18, 2025, and will have wide-reaching implications for those planning to travel to the United States on a nonimmigrant visa.

Who May Qualify for an Interview Waiver After September 2nd?

Despite the overall tightening of interview requirements, some categories of applicants may still be eligible to skip the in-person interview, including:

  1. Certain Diplomatic and Official Visa Holders

Applicants under the following visa classes are exempt from the interview requirement:

  • A-1, A-2 (representatives of foreign governments)
  • C-3 (excluding attendants or personal staff)
  • G-1 through G-4 (representatives of international organizations)
  • NATO-1 through NATO-6
  • TECRO E-1 (Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office officials)
  1. Diplomatic or Official-Type Visa Applicants

Those applying for visas that support diplomatic or governmental missions may still be eligible for interview waivers.

Continue reading

by

Navigating the U.S. immigration system can feel like walking through a legal minefield—especially when applying for a green card. What’s worse is that some of the most critical pitfalls are rarely discussed until it’s too late.

In this article, we’re uncovering five USCIS Green Card traps no one warns you about—from overlooked paperwork to silent deadlines that could derail your entire application.

Whether you’re applying through family, employment, or a special category, knowing these hidden risks could be the difference between receiving an approval or denial from USCIS.

#1 Incomplete or Incorrect Documents Submitted to USCIS

One of the most common and costly mistakes green card applicants make is submitting incomplete or incorrect documentation with your application. Even a small error, like a missing signature, outdated form version, or an incorrect fee, can result in delays, requests for evidence (RFEs), or even outright denial. Many applicants assume that minor details won’t matter, but USCIS officers are trained to scrutinize every page. Failing to double-check your forms, supporting documents, or filing fees can turn what should be a routine process into a months-long nightmare.

Real-Life Case Study: The Filing Fee Mistake That Led to Deportation

In a recent case, a green card applicant relied on advice from a notary who instructed them to submit a single check covering all required USCIS filing fees. Unfortunately, this was incorrect—USCIS required separate checks for different forms and was clearly stated on the form instructions. As a result, the entire application was rejected.

By the time the applicant received the rejection notice, they had already fallen out of legal status. This oversight triggered a deportation order that could have been easily avoided with proper filing.

This case illustrates how even seemingly minor administrative errors can have devastating, irreversible consequences. Always follow USCIS instructions carefully and consult a qualified immigration attorney when in doubt.

Continue reading

by

Green card holders returning to the U.S. are facing increased scrutiny in 2025. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is detaining more travelers with past legal issues or extended absences, and there’s a growing expectation to carry proof of ties to the U.S., like tax returns or lease agreements. New biometric systems track travel more closely, and frequent or long trips raise red flags about abandoning residency.

Green card holders are required to maintain continuous residence in the U.S. and extended or frequent trips abroad—especially those lasting over 180 days—can trigger a presumption of abandonment of permanent resident status.

Here are four key trends green card holders should be aware of when returning to the United States after temporary foreign travel.

Trend #1: Have Proof of Ties to the United States

Green card holders may be questioned by CBP about their ties and continuous residency in the United States. To help prevent complications—especially for those who have been outside the United States for 180 days or more—it may be wise for such individuals to present strong evidence of continued residence in the U.S., such as recent tax returns, employment verification, valid driver’s license, mortgage or lease agreements, and utility bills, to demonstrate that you have not abandoned your residency.

Even trips as short as three months can raise questions about your ties to the U.S.

Trend #2: CBP Officers Are Tracking Travel History

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers are closely reviewing the travel history of green card holders, with a close eye toward frequent or extended trips abroad. Long absences from the United States (6 months or longer) can lead to questioning or increased scrutiny at the border.

CBP officers have questioned travelers wanting to know the purpose for their trip abroad, the length of their absence, and whether their primary residence is in the U.S. or another country.

Be prepared to clearly explain your answers to these questions.

Continue reading

by

For many immigrants, attending a green card interview is a long-awaited step toward permanent residency in the United States. But in recent months, an increasing number of applicants have faced a troubling outcome—detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials at the green card interview with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

In this blog post, we share why this is happening, who is most at risk, and what immigrants should know before walking into their interview.

Immigration Enforcement on the Rise

Immigration enforcement has been on the rise nationwide, with federal authorities ramping up arrests, detentions, and deportations under increasingly aggressive policies. This uptick includes broader cooperation between local law enforcement and immigration agents, expanded use of surveillance technologies, and a growing number of workplace and home raids across multiple states.

These tactics have created a climate of fear, discouraging immigrants from accessing schools, places of work, and even hospitals. In Los Angeles, for example, a wave of coordinated ICE raids last month led to hundreds of arrests and heightened tensions.

ICE officers have also been arresting individuals immediately after their cases are dismissed in immigration court. These arrests have been reported nationwide and are discouraging immigrants from attending their scheduled court hearings.

Continue reading